What James Curran calls the liberal meta-narrative of media
history is the standard framework employed in describing
the trajectory of the Dutch media. Yet much evidence
indicates that throughout the twentieth century the Dutch
media have more commonly served elite interests than the
public interest. Initially the media were subservient to politics,
later the market became dominant. This paper criticises
the liberal reading of Dutch media history and argues for
the viability of a radical reading. After a review of historiographical
issues, a critical history of the Dutch media from
the thirties onwards is presented, with a focus on the period
since the sixties.
CNKI Scholar; Communication Abstracts; Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences; International Bibliography of Periodical Literature (IBZ); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Peace Research Abstracts; Research Alert; Sage Public Administration Abstracts; ScienceDirect; Scopus (Elsevier); Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI); Social SciSearch; Sociological Abstracts.
Contact
EURICOM, Javnost - The Public
Pot na Golovec 1
SI - 1000 Ljubljana
Slovenia