The notion of “diplomatic attitude” in rhetoric as defined by Chaim Perelman may be associated with sophistry. However, such a bias raises the more fundamental question of a possible link between diplomatic rhetoric and sophistic, or even sophistry. Could such a link be theorised to help understand international relations? In other words, does the notion of a “sophistic rhetoric” enable us to characterise the rhetorical shape of international relations today?
CNKI Scholar; Communication Abstracts; Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences; International Bibliography of Periodical Literature (IBZ); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Peace Research Abstracts; Research Alert; Sage Public Administration Abstracts; ScienceDirect; Scopus (Elsevier); Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI); Social SciSearch; Sociological Abstracts.
Contact
EURICOM, Javnost - The Public
Pot na Golovec 1
SI - 1000 Ljubljana
Slovenia