The notion of “diplomatic attitude” in rhetoric as defined by Chaim Perelman may be associated with sophistry. However, such a bias raises the more fundamental question of a possible link between diplomatic rhetoric and sophistic, or even sophistry. Could such a link be theorised to help understand international relations? In other words, does the notion of a “sophistic rhetoric” enable us to characterise the rhetorical shape of international relations today?
Current Contents & Social and Behavioral Sciences, Index to Journals in Mass Communication, International Bibliography of Periodical Literature, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, Linguistic and Language Behavior Abstracts, Peace Research Abstracts, Research Alert, Sage Public Administration Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, Social SciSearch, Sociological Abstracts.
Contact
EURICOM, Javnost - The Public
Pot na Golovec 1
SI - 1000 Ljubljana
Slovenia
